The author argues in two directions that you either fail to recognize or ignore. First, it is still possible to change something for the better, it is not yet "

The author argues in two directions that you either fail to recognize or ignore. First, it is still possible to change something for the better, it is not yet "inevitable". Second, should this not happen, then it is not about "some places" and "some species" but about the quality of all biological live, including all of us humans. And then it is no longer done with a bit of adaptation as Darwin suggested, but really all (except maybe a few billionaires who prefer to be shot in a rocket to the moon) will have an existential problem. So, do not think how can we make the best of what's to come, but try everything to minimize the damage as long as we still have a hint of control. I plead that this is what makes us rational beings.