Yes, thank you... The argument is also contradictory: if the warnings risk "coddling" people too much, they must have the intended effect. But, at the same tim

Yes, thank you... The argument is also contradictory: if the warnings risk "coddling" people too much, they must have the intended effect. But, at the same time, it's claimed that they are useless/absurd/etc. Both can't be true at the same time. And if one accepts that they protect people who had traumatic experiences of violence, it's really quite something to tell them to "get over it" without having any similar experience. Besides, if people truly believe that emotional suffering is a requirement for a well-rounded character, would they argue in favour of subjecting everyone to trauma? Not dude ranch a-night-alone-in-the-woods, but actual harm? Maybe they would themselves really profit from some more real-world experience of struggle? Maybe donating all their belongings and starting a new life in a randomly chosen country or something like that.