> I'm asking for the calculations used to come to that 2.5x number. If you want to understand the data and methodology behind that particular number, you shoul

> I'm asking for the calculations used to come to that 2.5x number. If you want to understand the data and methodology behind that particular number, you should go read the paper. That's how this works. I've given you more than enough information to find it. > Please don't resort to personal attacks. I am simply calling a spade a spade. I spent far too much time here responding to your comments in good faith, when it is now clear that you will misrepresent my statements at every possible opportunity while consistently contributing nothing to the discussion yourself. If you feel that there was more value to be extracted from this discussion, I recommend that you take these "personal attacks" as constructive criticism.