4 ms·
> No one cares about your site that much to go to another browser just to browse it ON A PHONE Because they literally CANNOT switch from Safari’s rendering!?
by mthoms 5y ago
> No one cares about your site that much to go to another browser just to browse it ON A PHONE
Because they literally CANNOT switch from Safari’s rendering!?
The fact that you wrote this with so much confidence (featuring all caps and gratuitous swearing) signals to me that you aren’t genuinely listening to the argument(a) at all.
It signals to me that you are only interested in tribalistic hyperbole.
Besides: “It’s fine for me therefore it should be fine for you” is a terribly unconvincing argument.
- pjerem 5y agoNo you missed its point : even in Android, nobody it’s going to change browser if your site is broken. Users will just assume your site is broken. And to be fair, it’s the same thing on desktop browsers. So, like it or not, even if iOS allowed other rendering engines on browsers, you would probably be stuck with supporting Safari anyway.
- mthoms 5y ago>nobody it’s going to change browser if your site is broken. Users will just assume your site is broken. And to be fair, it’s the same thing on desktop browsers. Sorry but, history says otherwise: 1) Netscape users came across "works best in IE" banners and IE usage skyrocketed. 2) IE users came across "works best in Firefox/Chrome" notices and IE usage plummeted in favour of those better browsers. Chrome didn't get to where it is solely based on marketing - it had some very strong advantages in the early years. >you would probably be stuck with supporting Safari anyway. I don't disagree there. But increased competition would force Apple to up their game. A win for everyone.