> There was no sure proof she did it Exactly. And yet she was treated as one by the media and justice system. She even spent time in prison for it. Even thoug

> There was no sure proof she did it Exactly. And yet she was treated as one by the media and justice system. She even spent time in prison for it. Even though there was no proof she did it. > nor that she was innocent There's no proof that you're innocent either, maybe you did it and should spend a few years in prison until later acquitted? Absence of proof of innocence does NOT imply guilt. > of course claiming she is the victim She was a victim. Not the same as the murder victim, but she got her reputation ruined, had her family go into debt trying to pay legal fees and SPENT YEARS IN PRISON. For something that there was no evidence she did, was evidence someone else did (who by the way got less time than she got, before she was acquitted), and for which she was eventually found innocent of and acquitted for. Maybe develop some empathy.