4 ms·
From the decision on the application for permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court [0]: > The applicant describes himself as a “journalist in new media”. W
by dpwm 5y ago
From the decision on the application for permission to appeal to the UK Supreme Court [0]:
> The applicant describes himself as a “journalist in new media”. Whatever that may involve, it is relevant to distinguish his position from that of the mainstream press, which is regulated, and subject to codes of practice and ethics in a way in which those writing as the applicant does are not. To the extent that the submissions for the applicant make comparisons with other press contempts, and the role of mainstream journalists, this is a factor which should be recognised.
[0] https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/cos-general-docs/pdf-docs-for-opinions/2021hcj3.pdf?sfvrsn=0 https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/cos-genera...
- croes 5y ago>subject to codes of practice and ethics "The code is more what you'd call 'guidelines' than actual rules"
- TheOtherHobbes 5y agoMeanwhile in the regulated press: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/the-sun-and-daily-mail-fuelling-prejudice-racist-violence-hate-crime-speech-uk-ecri-report-a7351856.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/the-sun-and-d...