I'm confused at the genetics angle that both you and brobdingnagians took on this. I'll admit that I don't fully understand the science behind the article, and

I'm confused at the genetics angle that both you and brobdingnagians took on this. I'll admit that I don't fully understand the science behind the article, and I'd like to be corrected if I'm wrong, but I don't see anything in the article that makes a direct link between the blood marker and genetics. As far as the down votes go, it's a little strange that an article talking about new findings about our understanding of COVID prompted a response about the government controlling our bodies. Similar to the genetics angle, I don't see anything in the article that even suggests this information will be used to keep someone inside their house. I guess it could be, but I don't get the point. Should we stop the advancement of science because there's some remote possibility that the Government will use it to "tell us what to do"? I mean you bring an interesting point, but at the same time, we now have an indicator that may tell us more about how one person might react to COVID. I don't see why that's causing us to worry about some 1984-ish dystopian future.