3 ms·

The entire point of Uno is being an implementation of UWP (notice the very specific goal here), while using native UWP with no overhead when on Windows. Since

The entire point of Uno is being an implementation of UWP (notice the very specific goal here), while using native UWP with no overhead when on Windows. Since WinUI 3 is multiplatform (in conjunction with the first party Linux/Android and OSX/iOS support in .Net 5 and 6, and with MAUI), Uno no longer needs to exist outside of dealing with legacy UWP code (which, as per Microsoft rules, shall never die). Also, re: web UIs, I hate to inform you, but everyone hates these. They are slow, clunky, optimized for all the wrong things, inconsistent, and sometimes ugly. The move to HTML canvas-based UIs in otherwise native apps Android and iOS is why most apps on phones are slow, even though a purely native one would have been fast on an ancient phone. Please do not repeat this mistake.

reader_mode 5y ago
If you are building form apps and stuff where delivering something working is the main objective (most enterprise apps) web UI is by far the best choice - ecosystem is huge, plenty of developers and designers to hire, tools let you export stuff like styles directly from designs, etc. If you care about user experience - writing it for each platform would have ended up being faster in the last app I did with flutter - so many subtle things that dragged the development out for weeks where as native had all these things working out of the box. I haven't worked with Xamarin in a while but I remember the quality was the worst out of all solutions I've used. So many moving parts, "this works in the latest version" and then half of other dependencies haven't been updated, and you just said the same thing.
ptx 5y ago
> Since WinUI 3 is multiplatform Hm? I thought MAUI was the multiplatform UI toolkit and WinUI 3 was the native Windows 10 UI toolkit (evolved from UWP) repackaged for bundling with each app?
- oaiey 5y ago
  Multi-Platform in the windows division means Xbox, older win 10 versions and things. Microsoft uses this term very naive. I hope I do not destroy the dreams of someone.
  - cptskippy 5y ago
    > I hope I do not destroy the dreams of someone. You kinda did. :) I was trying to grok the point of Uno if WinUI was truly multi-platform in the MacOS/Linux/Android/iOS sense.
  - pjmlp 5y ago
    Just like for Apple multiple platform means macOS, iOS and watchOS, because at the end of the day it isn't the same OS, nor hardware.

reader_mode 5y ago

If you are building form apps and stuff where delivering something working is the main objective (most enterprise apps) web UI is by far the best choice - ecosystem is huge, plenty of developers and designers to hire, tools let you export stuff like styles directly from designs, etc. If you care about user experience - writing it for each platform would have ended up being faster in the last app I did with flutter - so many subtle things that dragged the development out for weeks where as native had all these things working out of the box. I haven't worked with Xamarin in a while but I remember the quality was the worst out of all solutions I've used. So many moving parts, "this works in the latest version" and then half of other dependencies haven't been updated, and you just said the same thing.

ptx 5y ago

> Since WinUI 3 is multiplatform Hm? I thought MAUI was the multiplatform UI toolkit and WinUI 3 was the native Windows 10 UI toolkit (evolved from UWP) repackaged for bundling with each app?

oaiey 5y ago
Multi-Platform in the windows division means Xbox, older win 10 versions and things. Microsoft uses this term very naive. I hope I do not destroy the dreams of someone.
- cptskippy 5y ago
  > I hope I do not destroy the dreams of someone. You kinda did. :) I was trying to grok the point of Uno if WinUI was truly multi-platform in the MacOS/Linux/Android/iOS sense.
- pjmlp 5y ago
  Just like for Apple multiple platform means macOS, iOS and watchOS, because at the end of the day it isn't the same OS, nor hardware.