3 ms·
That is quite interesting, and makes sense! The spread-spectrum signal is a psuedo-random, but same sequence for all receivers, while the noise varies and shoul
by dognotdog 5y ago
That is quite interesting, and makes sense! The spread-spectrum signal is a psuedo-random, but same sequence for all receivers, while the noise varies and should cancel out.
Though, if I am not mistaken, the laws of super-sampling hold in this case, and SNR is only improved by O(sqrt(N)) for N samples, so this approach will have practical limits as one has to place a very large number of receivers in range of the emitter (or do auto-correlations over a very long time window), with enough separation to make sure the noise isn't correlated anymore, if looking for a signal deep below the noise floor.
- sudosysgen 5y agoI'm rusty on this but I do believe such a limit exists. However thankfully for this research it's about detecting radars, so thanks to the inverse square law there's a limit to how deep beneath the noise floor you need to look.