When a company uses unrelated facts to try to steer the opinion, it means they have nothing else to defend themselves with. It still makes financial sense for

When a company uses unrelated facts to try to steer the opinion, it means they have nothing else to defend themselves with. It still makes financial sense for them to fight this ruling even if they have 0 basis for it: simply delaying the paiement of a 800M euro fine cover the lawyers' fees. There should be interests on fines to account for this.