3 ms·
Yes, it is, which is why I called it that and not the constitution.
by guerrilla 5y ago
Yes, it is, which is why I called it that and not the constitution.
- est31 5y agoThe claim was though that the constitution contains rules to ban political speech. Even if you see Volksverhetzung as political speech (just because it's uttered by politicians doesn't make it political), the rule banning it is not part of the constitution.
- guerrilla 5y agoThat's why I didn't claim it was. I was just providing information on where what the person was probably thinking of actually was.