4 ms·
So your point is that the web sound be less capable, and Safari is the last browser trying to cap the web's knees. That seems to me like the point of all these
by whatever_dude 5y ago
So your point is that the web sound be less capable, and Safari is the last browser trying to cap the web's knees.
That seems to me like the point of all these recent articles.
- sbuk 5y agoThat seem like an ideal situation. Which 'web' are you referring to? The standards compliant, semantically structured one, or the Google 'web'?
- psd1 5y agoI'm not buying the dichotomy. Apart from anything browser-specific, JavaScript's weirdnesses ought to demolish this ideal as a real possibility. It's just a question of how broken, how crufty.
- sbuk 5y agoHow about how open? Browser specific JS is a misnomer because blink and V8 have ~70% market share. This is a bad thing for the open web. It was a bad thing when it was IE6, and allowing chromium based browser to grow beyond 70% while Google are firmly in the driving seat is more dangerous.