43 ms·
This is a really weak paper IMHO, and I would give it a strong -1 if I was a reviewer. These people are mindlessly applying the results of a static analysis to
by fermigier 5y ago
This is a really weak paper IMHO, and I would give it a strong -1 if I was a reviewer.
These people are mindlessly applying the results of a static analysis tool which, as most similar tools do, reports ginormous amounts of false positive, and conclude without even a caveat "half of the packages on PyPI have at least one security issue".
That's about as useful as administering an unreliable COVID test that give 50% false positives and concluding "have of the world population has COVID".
- hanselot 5y agoI wonder if that last part could possibly ever have happened. Would be interested for a scientist to explain how the PCR test kits produce their results "accurately" indeed.