4 ms·
I agree that the algorithms should be publicly reviewable. But I'm not sure that solves the central issue which is that there's a tension between what's financi
by whakim 5y ago
I agree that the algorithms should be publicly reviewable. But I'm not sure that solves the central issue which is that there's a tension between what's financially good for social networks (algorithms that increase engagement - which disproportionately favors echo chambers, controversial and shallow content, etc.) and what's good for the general public.
- gunapologist99 5y ago> what's good for the general public. I personally don't really care what facebook (or anyone else) believes is good for me. I'll be the judge of that, thank you very much. And if I want to eat chocolate all day, I'll do that, too.
- whakim 5y agoSocial networks aren't in the business of showing you what's "good for you." They're in the business of showing you what's good for them (e.g. things that will increase your engagement).
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]