3 ms·
> and they're all members So, in other words, their rights to bargain and engage in mutual agreements is restricted. You literally just explained how their ri
by stale2002 5y ago
> and they're all members
So, in other words, their rights to bargain and engage in mutual agreements is restricted.
You literally just explained how their rights are limited.
Specifically, it is limited in that you have to be a part of this group, to engage in certain agreements.
And even within that group, people are prevented from engaging in certain mutual agreements.
- heavyset_go 5y ago> So, in other words, their rights to bargain and engage in mutual agreements is restricted. You can negotiate without union representation. You're also free to be a non-union actor.
- stale2002 5y ago> You can negotiate without union representation There are limits on the contracts that I could engage with, with another mutually interested party, is the point. If there were no limits, then, almost by definition, it would not be a union. So yes, a union puts limits on the contracts that mutually interested parties can engage in. Were you not aware that unions put limits on the contracts that mutually interested parties can engage in? Did you think that a company, and an interested worker, could just completely ignore union rules, and create their own contract, that conflicts with the rules of the union?