3 ms·
That's a great critique of the CSA, but it's not really legally relevant. No court would convict for possession of endogenous DMT, and then that would be the pr
by Cushman 15y ago
That's a great critique of the CSA, but it's not really legally relevant. No court would convict for possession of endogenous DMT, and then that would be the precedent.
Or to put it more simply, you're innocent until proven guilty. Felon means conviction.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- bediger 15y agoYou're quibbling. I mean, I understand that legally, one has to obtain a conviction to refer to someone as a felon, but practically, that's not the case, not with activist DAs floating around, trying to make a name for themselves as "tough on crime".
- Cushman 15y agoYeah, that's a fair point. But what I was getting at is that no one has ever been convicted for endogenous possession, and no one ever will, so in this case my point stands.