5 ms·
My specific issue with YouTube is that the Content ID process _isn't_ the DMCA (which, while not great, is much fairer to individual creators than YouTube's dis
by ascagnel_ 5y ago
My specific issue with YouTube is that the Content ID process _isn't_ the DMCA (which, while not great, is much fairer to individual creators than YouTube's dispute resolution), it's the result of a big media corp fantasy that Google somehow willed into reality to avoid losing their protection and being liable to Viacom.
The DMCA, at least as it's written, is somewhat equitable: if I think you post something of mine, I can go to a lawyer in good faith to file a notice to get it removed, you can go to your lawyer and have it restored, and then we hash it out in court without the video provider needing to be involved for the duration of the case. With YouTube, it's YT throwing up more roadblocks in my way (as the uploader) should you start sniffing around. Plus, you can claim copyright on my work in a scalable, automated way, without needing to verify individual works, and that last part is where all the abuse of the system happens.
Google has absolutely no intention of fixing this claims process; doing so would break the armistice they agreed to with Viacom more than a decade ago, since Google wasn't complying with the DMCA.
- lupire 5y agoyou don't need a lawyer for a counterclaim.
- ascagnel_ 5y agoYou don't _need_ a lawyer, but I'd at least hire one for an hour to review such a letter. If the case proceeds, that counterclaim will almost certainly be entered into evidence, and you'd want someone with more background and knowledge to make sure you're saying the right things.
- omoikane 5y agoYou will reveal much of your personal information to copyright trolls if you choose to fight things yourself. https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6005919 https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/6005919
- SR2Z 5y agoIt's a legal process. At the bare minimum it has to uniquely identify you. It's kind of bizarre to suggest otherwise.