I don't understand your point, you're building a strawman and then attacking it. This architecture works for them, and will probably keep doing so as you can se

I don't understand your point, you're building a strawman and then attacking it. This architecture works for them, and will probably keep doing so as you can see on the other response. > Experience shows there’s just no reason to talk to people about these specifics because even though they’ve never implemented it before or even done the math, you definitely know better than I do. But they DID implement it and it works perfectly well for them. I don't understand why you're splitting hairs about fantasy scenarios. If they had a different problem, they would solve it differently. If you've faced something like that, feel free to share you story, what were the constraints and how you solved them.