3 ms·

> I copied and pasted exactly what you wrote. And then misparaphrased it with a crystal clear bias. > I criticized an obviously disgusting group (that you’re

> I copied and pasted exactly what you wrote. And then misparaphrased it with a crystal clear bias. > I criticized an obviously disgusting group (that you’re a part of) and you’re making a judgement of my character out of adversarialism. Ah yes. Adversarialism, after you make a blanket statement like that is totally surprising, lol. The fact is that the chance of sexual assault in the military is low, and reporting of it is improving, and the exact number of incidents cannot be known, only speculated on. But apparently, if 2% of Muslims become suicide bombers, all Muslims are bad, according to you; and if most rapists are men, then all men are assholes, according to your reasoning; unfortunately that is what I'll generously call "illogic"; you can speak to countless military members who had good experiences, but if a few women (and a handful of men) got fucked over, then I guess the whole system is fucked, eh? Good luck applying that to society at large (which, by the way, is IMPROVING along with the military). Making approval depend on perfection (instead of consistent improvement) is the enemy of good, once again

void_mint 5y ago
> Ah yes. Adversarialism, after you make a blanket statement like that is totally surprising, lol. Skips the whole post. > The fact is that the chance of sexual assault in the military is low Where did you get the "low" figure from? I wouldn't call it low at all. I would call it insanely high. > But apparently, if 2% of Muslims become suicide bombers, all Muslims are bad, You're saying a lot of very ridiculous things. If an institution condones sexual abuse, it is fair to point it out. > Good luck applying that to society at large (which, by the way, is IMPROVING along with the military). I guess it all depends on how you look at it (meaning, if you choose to throw your hands up and say "it's going great!" without actually paying attention). > Making approval depend on perfection (instead of consistent improvement) is the enemy of good, once again Who brought up perfection? I'm saying it's an absolute shitshow, for which there is data to corroborate. You're saying "no it's improving", based on legitimately 0 data at all.

void_mint 5y ago

> Ah yes. Adversarialism, after you make a blanket statement like that is totally surprising, lol. Skips the whole post. > The fact is that the chance of sexual assault in the military is low Where did you get the "low" figure from? I wouldn't call it low at all. I would call it insanely high. > But apparently, if 2% of Muslims become suicide bombers, all Muslims are bad, You're saying a lot of very ridiculous things. If an institution condones sexual abuse, it is fair to point it out. > Good luck applying that to society at large (which, by the way, is IMPROVING along with the military). I guess it all depends on how you look at it (meaning, if you choose to throw your hands up and say "it's going great!" without actually paying attention). > Making approval depend on perfection (instead of consistent improvement) is the enemy of good, once again Who brought up perfection? I'm saying it's an absolute shitshow, for which there is data to corroborate. You're saying "no it's improving", based on legitimately 0 data at all.