3 ms·
Maybe so, I'm no expert. But it does seem like the SCOTUS ruling presents a dead end for the CDC if it tries for another moratorium unilaterally.
by nate_meurer 5y ago
Maybe so, I'm no expert. But it does seem like the SCOTUS ruling presents a dead end for the CDC if it tries for another moratorium unilaterally.
- Retric 5y agoSure, for COVID but not a hypothetical SARS-16 in 2046. It’s a tough balancing act because retroactively judging their response to COVID is one thing, but nobody wants to tie their hands of a vastly worse disease shows up. Biologically a disease could be airborne and more infectious with a 20+% case fatality rate and a 1 month incubation period. At which point just about anything is on the table.