Sorry but a lot of the complaints from the article and what you linked are... well weird. Look, I'm no grand ninja guru wizard programmer, but after a decade of

Sorry but a lot of the complaints from the article and what you linked are... well weird. Look, I'm no grand ninja guru wizard programmer, but after a decade of programming on and off as a job... wtf are you all smoking? Theres nothing to preach but to check your hubris. A majority of problems stem not from OOP or whatever language being used, it's from over abstracting. This is mostly due to trying to pre-build for a scale that will 99.8% never happen or to account for some wild potential esoteric function in the ether that'll never happen as well. There's some weird dick measuring contest out there on the internet that I wasn't invited to where everyone is trying to out over complicate each other. They never stopped to properly learn any real design patterns, so their classes end up all over the place. "Its OOP's fault!" And hell, sometimes you used a hammer when a screwdriver was more appropriate. No big deal, we all make mistakes in lines of design logic. It ain't OOP's fault you made an oops.