4 ms·
I am excited to see where these questions lead.
by thomzane 5y ago
I am excited to see where these questions lead.
- grepfru_it 5y agoSomething like this? [GitHub Copilot License Config Menu] Show suggestions with the following tags: - [ ] GPLv3 - [x] GPLv2 - [ ] AGPL - [x] CC-BY-SA - [x] Apache License - [x] MIT License - [ ] No License Attribution
- dunham 5y agoWould that require generating 2^n models or can models be combined?
- blooalien 5y agoI would think that to combine the models, the software would need some internal method to differentiate between the licenses used by the various code sources it's pulling it's suggestion "ideas" from, and the compatibility between the licenses of those sources and your own choice of licensing for the project you're creating.
- tyingq 5y agoOther picklists might be handy too, especially something that would narrow to higher quality sources. And they need a report button with a picklist of reasons.
- imoverclocked 5y agoeg, cleanliness described by different linters/static-analysis tools? Can we actually make better code suggestions by choosing examples which are known to have less super-obvious flaws?
- tyingq 5y agoLinters would be nice, though the bar is pretty low. A lot of the examples won't even compile :)
- remram 5y agoThose licenses require attributions. You can't just say "Copyright (c) all the projects indexed in Copilot".
- grepfru_it 5y agoThere's certain information I cannot share, but you can see the general idea of what I'm throwing out here
- judge2020 5y agoI would imagine saying "Copyright (c) appropriate rights holders on planet Earth" wouldn't satisfy most license attribution claims if they were ever tested in court.