A lot of talk here about the getting the vaccination is a moral imperative for the greater public safety. One parable I can think of is mandatory abortions. At

A lot of talk here about the getting the vaccination is a moral imperative for the greater public safety. One parable I can think of is mandatory abortions. At a time where the planets resources are diminishing surely another human is a risk to us all. And who’s to say someone’s child doesn’t end being a deranged, homicidal maniac. Women have an imperative, no are required by law, to abort at the earliest possible moment. And compared to the Varus, there is a 100% chance a child will use up resources, opposed to whatever new kill rate the virus has. There are a lot of our-there defences for anti-vax, the ones that make the most sense are: (1) COVID is not as deadly as the news cycle makes it out, (2) the vaccine is still in trial, (3) there are no repercussions for vaccine producers. Of course, the implications of these points is what turns off the other side. The loudest theory in the room gets noticed, and that happens to be 5G microchips or whatever. When really, it’s just a new tax on everyday people. Politicians have an interest in the companies producing the vaccine so they’ll enforce laws to make them mandatory. The surveillance state loves any excuse to track us more than they are already. Splintering the population along ideological lines further benefits the system in place. So, yes, regarding the implications of points (1), (2) and (3), I believe the system in place would willingly manipulate this non-issue for its own benefit. And, if your argument is vaccination is better for society as a whole see parable above.