4 ms·
AFAICT, a sufficient AI review examiner would validate all inputs that are reasonably coherent, but not necessarily novel.
by dleslie 5y ago
AFAICT, a sufficient AI review examiner would validate all inputs that are reasonably coherent, but not necessarily novel.
- dasudasu 5y agoMore likely to be the opposite. It would be very easy to explore prior art through tons of databases. On the other hand, AI has been touted for years to be on the verge of revolutionizing case law and this has yet to happen.
- annoyingnoob 5y agoIn my experience with patents, you don't really need something novel as much as you need unique words in your patent, its all about wordsmithing.