3 ms·
Your "probably" means you've refused to look at the relevant experimental evidence? "proportional to mv²" also means "proportional to 1/2 mv²" and "proportiona
by eesmith 5y ago
Your "probably" means you've refused to look at the relevant experimental evidence?
"proportional to mv²" also means "proportional to 1/2 mv²" and "proportional to 123.45 mv²".
Assuming your gravitational and inertial masses are supposed to be the same, then 1/2 m v² is, by Noether's theorem, a consequence of conservation of energy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Example_1:_Conservation_of_energy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem#Example_1:... .
- SirIsaac 5y ago>"proportional to mv²" also means "proportional to 1/2 mv²" and "proportional to 123.45 mv²". Yes. This is my point. The error has never been found experimentally because everything eventually gets resolved to Newton's E = Fd. Dividing every result by 2 makes no difference because the proportions do not change. I still don't see why gravitational mass is a problem but I'll keep looking into it.