In this case though it's not nuance but blatant gaps and bad logic. In this case it is because it's easy to shut down your rational thinking when confronted wit

In this case though it's not nuance but blatant gaps and bad logic. In this case it is because it's easy to shut down your rational thinking when confronted with something that seems to affirm your beliefs. An equivalent article that used the flowering date of a different plant to as "indisputable evidence" for the non-existence of global warming would have been rightly torn to shreds on here.