> How could anyone honestly believe that mass collusion amongst a distributed and isolated group of people This is pure speculation and I don't want to sound l

> How could anyone honestly believe that mass collusion amongst a distributed and isolated group of people This is pure speculation and I don't want to sound like I'm supporting the Post Office and Fujitsu's behaviour, which was despicable. I wondered if their previous systems were, internally, considered to be very flaky. You then get a new shiny system with a very different set of results and instead of the response being "why is the old system and new system disagreeing so badly" you get the response "hey, this is great, the new system has revealed wrong doing the old system was not able to". As I say it's a guess but I just wondered.