3 ms·
It’s definitely annualized. That makes the most sense. And when you look at the case shiller index directly it bears that out. Also interesting is Feb to Feb w
by bitexploder 5y ago
It’s definitely annualized. That makes the most sense. And when you look at the case shiller index directly it bears that out. Also interesting is Feb to Feb was only 12% annual increase. But may to may was 17% increase so there was definitely an acceleration there. Some markets are insanely hot. We saw homes going for 30-40% more than the previous year in our neighborhood. A house almost exactly the same as ours sold this year in June for almost double what we paid for ours a few years back. Some real estate markets are more than just hot.
e: its rolling 12, which is what I meant, but yeah.. words matter :)
- pessimizer 5y agoI looked it up and it's not annualized, it's year over year. Therefore very sensitive to chosen start and endpoints.
- AnimalMuppet 5y agoOK, but with year over year, it makes exactly zero sense to say that the May-to-May change of 17% was "on top of" the April-to-April change of 15%.
- mandelbrotwurst 5y agoMaybe they meant it’s “on top of” it in a table of YoY changes by month sorted in descending order ¯\_(ツ)_/¯