There's no reason to think they'll do this, though. You're just wildly speculating. The much more likely scenario is that they say "find a remote position at th

There's no reason to think they'll do this, though. You're just wildly speculating. The much more likely scenario is that they say "find a remote position at the company or leave". And they're not so much "mandating the health of their workers", they're mandating that their workers don't harm other workers. > If someone at Google died from drunk driving, would it be fair to ban alcohol? If enough people got wasted at work and hurt other employees as a result, they'd probably think about limiting alcohol at events at the office. That's a closer example to this vaccination requirement.