2 ms·
It is not complicated. It is using different conventions. You can say that ZFS/BTRFS are more complicated than XFS/EXT4 + device mapper, but while it may be sl
by zekica 5y ago
It is not complicated. It is using different conventions.
You can say that ZFS/BTRFS are more complicated than XFS/EXT4 + device mapper, but while it may be slightly more complicated, the more important thing is that they are different.
It took me a while for IPv6 to "click". I still don't like a couple of RA/NDP related settings, but it works and is much much easier not to deal with NAT.
- magicalhippo 5y ago> It is not complicated. Personally I find it a lot more complicated, and not just because it is different. Part of it is inherent complexity, part of it is that it's still evolving as a specification, part of it is ISP's not following best practices, part of it is lacking software support. I'm trying to keep IPv6 enabled. But every few months I hit some issue where IPv6 is the reason stuff stops working or I can't get something to work, and it's just oh-so-tempting to switch off IPv6.