4 ms·
what rebuttal? just a bunch of comments from people who are in denial of the fact that Google willingly and knowingly infringed on Java patents when they were d
by PotatoChips 15y ago
what rebuttal? just a bunch of comments from people who are in denial of the fact that Google willingly and knowingly infringed on Java patents when they were developing Android.
Google already indicated that they are willing to pay and settle this thing with Oracle.
- shareme 15y agoahem dude.. 99.9999% of all US patents suits are never brought to trial..it was not settlement offer but a debate on stay two different things ..could not MS find better mouthpieces?
- rbanffy 15y ago> could not MS find better mouthpieces? They need knowledgeable people with low moral standards. That's hard to find.
- pyre 15y ago> what rebuttal? just a bunch of comments from people who are > in denial of the fact that Google willingly and knowingly > infringed on Java patents when they were developing Android At this point, you've revealed yourself to be a troll, but I'll bite because I'm bored. All of those comments were pointing out the same things that people are pointing out here. The phrases "defend our actions" and "make enemies" within the context of Java does not logically (nor legally) imply willful and deliberate patent infringements against Java patents. Note that nothing in this 'rebuttal' says that Google didn't "willingly and knowingly" infringe Java patents. The argument is that you have not presented anything that proves that they did.