> Both have been ruled as acceptable and not covered by the 5th. As the article states, and some quick research would reveal, this is largely dependent upon wh

> Both have been ruled as acceptable and not covered by the 5th. As the article states, and some quick research would reveal, this is largely dependent upon which state, and which federal jurisdiction, the court is in. A final word has not been given on the matter and each court is allowed to interpret it as it chooses. As such, it has been ruled both for and against.