2 ms·
Okay, and? Yes, we don't have rules for every single possibly protective thing, but we do have rules for a lot of them. Your line of reasoning could also be us
by TulliusCicero 5y ago
Okay, and? Yes, we don't have rules for every single possibly protective thing, but we do have rules for a lot of them.
Your line of reasoning could also be used against seat belt laws or building codes: why have those for public safety if we don't ban alcohol?
edit: also, while I don't support banning alcohol, it wouldn't be a violation of a person's basic rights to ban it. That used to be the law of the land in the US, and even today there are still some dry counties (alcohol cannot be sold).