3 ms·
I'm not the downvoters but: I followed your link [1] and read the entire page multiple times and I can find no content which supports "recommending that the cy
by nullc 5y ago
I'm not the downvoters but:
I followed your link [1] and read the entire page multiple times and I can find no content which supports "recommending that the cycle count be lowered for vaccinated individuals".
It says that samples submitted for sequencing should be positive when CT<=28 or are detected as positive by another modality.
- a_conservative 5y agoI wish I could find a "slam dunk" source that stated what the current threshold recommended by the CDC, but I can't quite find it. I've personally read many sources that talked about using cycle counts above 30 over the past year. Some more discussion on this topic was on HN yesterday [0] also, from last August: One solution would be to adjust the cycle threshold used now to decide that a patient is infected. Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus. [1] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27972195 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27972195 [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testin...