3 ms·
Serious question: Is anyone putting up a real argument that the vaccines may have long-term harm that outweighs the harm done by the risk of the disease in the
by Arnt 5y ago
Serious question:
Is anyone putting up a real argument that the vaccines may have long-term harm that outweighs the harm done by the risk of the disease in the same timeframe? Say 20 years. Compute the risk of getting covid over 20 years based on, say, the risk seen in North Dakota over the last year and estimate a health outcome based on that. Is anyone putting up a real argument that any of the vaccines might have a comparable outcome?
- IG_Semmelweiss 5y agoI don't think I find most people saying there is an argument that tilts one way or the other. what i hear is, they genuinely not know.
- Arnt 5y agoI hear lots of people say there's an argument that tilts one way, specifically that the risk to the vaccinated is >1 orders of magnitude smaller than that to the unvaccinated. (I also hear lots of non-argument, such as "I don't know what's in…" from people who didn't say that about aspartame or other additives. My question was strictly about whether anyone is advancing a real argument that the risks may be comparable.)