4 ms·
That's an interesting point. In our case, I'd say that slower would have been fine because we already moved slowly trying to figure out the features that would
by blacktriangle 5y ago
That's an interesting point. In our case, I'd say that slower would have been fine because we already moved slowly trying to figure out the features that would really get people to start buying, at which point things took off. Given that we're not really pushing new technology and primarly competing on price and simplicity, it doesn't seem like speed to market was a determining factor for us, while having spent some time earlier thinking longer about some fundamental issues could have avoided some serious pain I am experiencing now.