I (possibly wrongly) apply the reverse of the “$100 note on the ground” parable to no-code tools. If a toolchain that allows to deliver fully functional softwa

I (possibly wrongly) apply the reverse of the “$100 note on the ground” parable to no-code tools. If a toolchain that allows to deliver fully functional software of appropriate complexity without writing code was even remotely feasible, Apple/Microsoft/Google would have already been pushing hard each for their own take on it. Considering the immense upside for whomever of the big tech that manages to do it first, and that they can throw much more resources at it than the best-valued SV unicorn, presumably they’ve tried (probably more times than we know); and presumably what they’ve found is that at a level of no-code tool sophistication where it’s good enough it becomes indistinguishable from programming—so they’re trying to attract more people into software engineering instead.