> Maybe you know someone who tried DDD, and it didn’t work for them? Maybe you worked with a person who didn’t understand it well, tried to force these techniqu

> Maybe you know someone who tried DDD, and it didn’t work for them? Maybe you worked with a person who didn’t understand it well, tried to force these techniques, and made everything too complex Maybe you’ve seen on Twitter that some famous software engineer said that DDD doesn’t work? Maybe for you, it’s a legendary Holy Grail that someone claims work for them – but nobody has seen it yet. Ina nutshell, that’s the problem with almost all software development methodology — we don’t/can’t frame any of them in a falsifiable manner, so it’s difficult for the field to progress, even over decades. Bad ideas keep hanging around, and can’t be filtered from good ones. One can always keep playing “No true Scotsman” games on anybody’s experience, so most discussions end up devolving into froth.