3 ms·
Sure, but on the other hand it's MIT so I'm actually willing to look at the source code.
by RobotCaleb 5y ago
Sure, but on the other hand it's MIT so I'm actually willing to look at the source code.
- CydeWeys 5y agoWhy wouldn't you be willing to look at GPL source code? That'd be writing off all of Linux as just the tip of the iceberg.
- blendergeek 5y agoWhy wouldn't you be willing to look at GPL code? Is it just GPL, or strong copyleft in general? Do you intend to release modified versions without releasing corresponding source code? Why should an author want to provide you with the source code, just so you can deny that privilege to others?
- RobotCaleb 5y agoIn my opinion (opinion, so I could be wrong), MIT and friends offer more freedom. I have a strong aversion to the concept of copyleft and usually try to avoid it for fear of "tainting" anything I touch after. In principle, where it makes sense, I rather like the idea of the sort of freedom claimed by GPL advocates but in practice I prefer to allow people to do whatever they want.
- RobotCaleb 5y agoTo answer your questions, no, I don't intend (or tend, for that matter) to takes modified versions without corresponding source code. It's not about what I do it's about what they say I can and can't do. I don't know why an author should. I'm not spending any time agonizing over what they should be doing. I don't understand why you threw that second half of the sentence in there as if the two are necessarily linked.