3 ms·

Well we don't really know that, because diagnosis is normally confirmed post-mortem. There could be many people walking around infected with prions that show no

• deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
• curryst 5y ago
  There's some pedantry here. There is evidence that some people have a mutation that prevents them from getting CJD. The mutation causes a small change in the proteins that CJD prions impact (changing a glycine to valine at a certain part of the protein). The working theory is that that structural change prevents CJD prions from being able to re-form healthy proteins, preventing the spread of the disease. I wouldn't be at all surprised if those proteins are eventually broken down by the body and removed. All that being said, I don't know if you would even consider it an "infection" if the person is immune to the prions spreading. Prions aren't generally transmissible, so if the prions don't do anything and can't be transmitted... is anything actually wrong? You and I are exposed to tons of bacteria every day, but as long as your body can fight it off (i.e. no symptoms and no transmission), we wouldn't usually call that an "infection". In the same light, presence of abnormal proteins that aren't causing an issue doesn't seem like something we would call an "infection". There's also the fact that some people inherit the disease (as in their body actually makes the prions itself), which doesn't make any sense in the context of an "infection". It's their own body producing the prions, so in those cases it's a genetic disease, not an infection.