4 ms·
The odd part is that if you smoke a cigarette with no additives, the difference is barely noticeable. I wonder why they feel the need to add so many additives f
by peanut_worm 5y ago
The odd part is that if you smoke a cigarette with no additives, the difference is barely noticeable. I wonder why they feel the need to add so many additives for such a minuscule effect
- mandmandam 5y agoI noticed a number of differences myself: First, my smokers cough went from extremely bad to quite mild when I switched to raw tobacco. The smell also dissipated much quicker with raw; it didn't leave that mephitic ass-miasma like the chemical tobacco did. After smoking raw for a while, I could taste the difference. No joke. It's like quitting sugar; you taste it more after, and it's not exactly pleasant. In fact my sense of smell and taste improved overall. Finally, it was easier to quit from raw compared to chemical. Very subjective, but I stand by it. Tobacco companies are prohibited from advertising raw as in any way healthier, and I get that. But like, surely it's obvious that cancer stuff + more cancer stuff is worse than just cancer stuff. The fact that we don't have any numbers on this (at least that I could ever find) is highly suspicious to me; surely that would be something worth working on.
- LargoLasskhyfv 5y agoI concure. Am down to 3 to 7 from 17 to 23 self rolled a day since maybe 15 years. Thin, long XXL filter, 6mm diameter. Should be two thirds of a commercial filter cigarette at most. Also with pauses of 3 to 5(sometimes even weeks) days without any, at all. I can live with that. The used papers play a big role also. I like them slow burning, but not slow like the transparent stuff one would use for a joint/reefer. Tried vaping. It's not the same.