3 ms·
In London, I'm inclined to agree with this. 2 days seems a fair balance. The trouble is that the majority of employees have signed a legally binding contract
by DrBazza 5y ago
In London, I'm inclined to agree with this. 2 days seems a fair balance.
The trouble is that the majority of employees have signed a legally binding contract that says "your legal place of employment is <insert address here>", meaning that you are legally obliged to go back into the office.
Some companies think it is a "competitive advantage" to have people back in the office. A couple of banks and accountancy firms certainly seem to think so.
But as everyone has said "it depends".
I've worked in 7-to-a-row open plan offices in banks, to small companies.
I was more productive in open-plan when I was in my early 20s, and far more productive on my own or in smaller quieter offices as I've gotten older.
Going back to this from the other day [1] "Insulating developers from interruptions" is the best reason to wfh.
[1] https://hackernoon.com/the-generational-divide-in-software-developers-bco354a https://hackernoon.com/the-generational-divide-in-software-d...