3 ms·
Yes, working from home is much better than working at open office. However there is some scenario where middle manager can make WFH as hellish as working at ope
by IvanAchlaqullah 5y ago
Yes, working from home is much better than working at open office. However there is some scenario where middle manager can make WFH as hellish as working at open office: by mandating everyone to install invasive spyware so they can "manage" you remotely.
Bonus point if the company didn't want to give/loan company devices, so you have to install it on your own personal devices.
- curiousigor 5y agoThat's a huge red flag for me though. If you're employed (so not working as a freelancer for the company), the employer is supposed to provide the equipment you can work on. For them to expect usage of personal devices and then have a requirement of installing these kind of tools on it wouldn't be expectable to me.
- vineyardmike 5y ago> Bonus point if the company didn't want to give/loan company devices, so you have to install it on your own personal devices. Oh i would NEVER. That sounds horrible.
- pawelwentpawel 5y agoHow common is having to install such spyware though? I hear stories about it but none of people that I know actually had to put up with it (or maybe they didn't know?). The closest I got to this situation was being told that if I want to do work on my personal laptop I'd have to install some software that would allow the IT department to wipe it out in case it gets stolen. While I understand the reason, it was an obvious nope from me.
- alfiedotwtf 5y agoThat's a 2-weeks notice event
- ASalazarMX 5y agoEh. I use Linux at home, and the work stuff happily lives in a Windows VM; but installing work software on my personal mobile devices? too much liability, just no.