4 ms·
It feels wrong to ban the sale of a product on the basis that "it might be used on the electrical grid". There is nothing stopping me from buying a PC and runn
by fridif 5y ago
It feels wrong to ban the sale of a product on the basis that "it might be used on the electrical grid".
There is nothing stopping me from buying a PC and running it on my own off grid solution.
If the power companies don't like my power consumption, they should simply implement solutions on their end, like charging me more money proportional to my usage.
- pedroma 5y agoPower companies do like your power consumption. It's the state that doesn't, but they also want you to keep buying electric cars.
- tehjoker 5y agoYou can build it yourself then. They're banning complete packages which is much more likely to reduce grid power consumption.
- Meandering 5y agoIt seems that charging a premium on energy use beyond a certain threshold would be far more effective. The carbon-cost of investigating high-end consumer electronics might actually be more than the few PCs that would be purchased.
- TheMightyLlama 5y agoSimilar to how broadband is charged? On the flipside of that, energy users could also have their energy throttled based on the number of consumers in the household. You have x energy credits as part of the package, if you don't want to pay over that then your energy will, of course, be throttled.