4 ms·
I'm not who you're replying to, but I'd like to know, what reason would WHO or anyone else have to maintain a high false positive rate under one admin and corre
by betwixthewires 5y ago
I'm not who you're replying to, but I'd like to know, what reason would WHO or anyone else have to maintain a high false positive rate under one admin and correct it for the next, other than to lessen the chances of the previous admin's reelection? It wasn't "good PR" it was bad PR, specifically for the previous admin in an election year. That sounds a lot like "lie to the public in order to take control of government" to me.
- apercu 5y agoOr using whatever agency they had to direct the US voters towards what they feel is more effect public health policies and stopping millions of unnecessary deaths? Look, I am not defending anyone, I am saying that _all_ things of this nature are political.