2 ms·
She's prominent enough that I'm sure they'll reinstate it. Guys, it's a beta right now. This is why. Part of signing up for G+ at this time is volunteering t
by blhack 15y ago
She's prominent enough that I'm sure they'll reinstate it.
Guys, it's a beta right now. This is why. Part of signing up for G+ at this time is volunteering to be a bug tester.
She found a bug that where it allowed here to put quotes in her name, even though she's not supposed to.
- dsr_ 15y agoThe problem is for all the people who are not prominent enough, but get nuked anyway. When people get special treatment because they are prominent, have a reputation, or have a posse, that's a problem. Often the problem is that the special treatment should not be special, but should be the usual case. I have at least four friends on G+ with this problem... which makes me suspect that the name/identity/pseudo problem is not merely a few special cases, but is in fact widespread.
- rjd 15y agoPull the other one. Its a deliberate feature not a bug. Its to try and detect the use of pseudonyms (and fake profiles) and force people to use real identities. I 100% will not support another platform which does this. Its to important to the arts not to have pseudonyms.