But enough information for what? Let’s say they had previous conversations about how to handle hostile media. Ideas included raising concerns with editors, pu

But enough information for what? Let’s say they had previous conversations about how to handle hostile media. Ideas included raising concerns with editors, pulling advertising, raising concerns with platforms/ISPs about “disinformation”, suing for libel, etc. So yes the CEO is implicated. He’s clearly in the decision chain - no doubt about it. But there’s nothing here about how much was deferred to subordinates. I guess that falls into the category of “offline discussion” - but that doesn’t mean anything nefarious.