3 ms·

I see very few skeptics. A true skeptic would be truly skeptical, including own ability and Dunning-Kruger effects. We mainly don't see that. It would be a bre

by loopz 5y ago

I see very few skeptics. A true skeptic would be truly skeptical, including own ability and Dunning-Kruger effects. We mainly don't see that. It would be a breath of fresh air for people to be open-minded and curious. Seek out cutting-edge information from experts now and then, and share that. There's room for being concerned, but more than that, may not be too helpful for anyone.

Comevius 5y ago
There are tens of thousands of papers published each year about climate change, there is a 100% scientific agreement. The peanut gallery in the comment section knows better, but can't be bothered to contribute to the discussion. https://www.hull.ac.uk/special/blog/why-people-still-believe-climate-change-is-fake-and-why-we-know-theyre-wrong https://www.hull.ac.uk/special/blog/why-people-still-believe... It is denial or ignorance. They are not sceptical of anything, they wouldn't know what to be sceptical of.