fascinating rebuttal, so because you - a random account - didn't notice it before, it must be a strawman argument. I don't really understand the utility of goi

fascinating rebuttal, so because you - a random account - didn't notice it before, it must be a strawman argument. I don't really understand the utility of going that direction? Like, are you advocating for something in particular such as anti-privacy measures or are really just independently unaware that people would say something while that's fascinating enough to you that it would be a fictional argument that you feel undermine "pro-privacy" talking points Its just hard to see why it would bother you enough to invalidate it