4 ms·

Are you saying they don't have the right to have a twitter account? So much news today is actually prompted or pulled from twitter/social media. When the vast

Are you saying they don't have the right to have a twitter account? So much news today is actually prompted or pulled from twitter/social media. When the vast majority of media is left biased [0] it would be hard to have a decent amount of the population hear what you are finding. [0] https://guides.lib.umich.edu/c.php?g=637508&p=4462444 https://guides.lib.umich.edu/c.php?g=637508&p=4462444

jsturges 5y ago
Your source literally begins with "There is no completely clear answer to this question because there is no one exact methodology to measure and rate the partisan bias of news sources."
- kokanator 5y ago
  Did you read the article or any of the references? Obviously there is no 'absolute' way but there are methods to assign a general bias.
lolwuut1 5y ago
Yes, I can see it being hard to get the “left wing media” to republish made up bullshit.
rvz 5y ago
> Are you saying they don't have the right to have a twitter account? Twitter probably now believes that @arizonaaudit has 'lost' this right. (You don't own your Twitter account anyway) But I'm sure even @arizonaaudit saw this coming in the first place. This is unsurprising since Twitter themselves have already admitted that they have a left-bias. From the CEO [0]: 'I fully admit our bias is more left-leaning'. They are obviously not the last but because this Twitter account leans from 'the other side', its fine to get rid of them from Twitter. /s Their platform, their guidelines, their rules. [0] https://thehill.com/policy/technology/402495-twitter-ceo-jack-dorsey-i-fully-admit-our-bias-is-more-left-leaning https://thehill.com/policy/technology/402495-twitter-ceo-jac...
- kokanator 5y ago
  From the reference: "But the real question behind the question is, are we doing something according to political ideology or viewpoints? And we are not. Period," he added. So either he is full on lying or he thinks we are too stupid to understand the difference?

jsturges 5y ago

Your source literally begins with "There is no completely clear answer to this question because there is no one exact methodology to measure and rate the partisan bias of news sources."

kokanator 5y ago
Did you read the article or any of the references? Obviously there is no 'absolute' way but there are methods to assign a general bias.

lolwuut1 5y ago

Yes, I can see it being hard to get the “left wing media” to republish made up bullshit.

rvz 5y ago

> Are you saying they don't have the right to have a twitter account? Twitter probably now believes that @arizonaaudit has 'lost' this right. (You don't own your Twitter account anyway) But I'm sure even @arizonaaudit saw this coming in the first place. This is unsurprising since Twitter themselves have already admitted that they have a left-bias. From the CEO [0]: 'I fully admit our bias is more left-leaning'. They are obviously not the last but because this Twitter account leans from 'the other side', its fine to get rid of them from Twitter. /s Their platform, their guidelines, their rules. [0] https://thehill.com/policy/technology/402495-twitter-ceo-jack-dorsey-i-fully-admit-our-bias-is-more-left-leaning https://thehill.com/policy/technology/402495-twitter-ceo-jac...

kokanator 5y ago
From the reference: "But the real question behind the question is, are we doing something according to political ideology or viewpoints? And we are not. Period," he added. So either he is full on lying or he thinks we are too stupid to understand the difference?